Welcome to the ULC Minister's Network

Keisha Merchant

The Son Superior to the Angels

  •  

    Hebrews 1

    The Son Superior to Angels

     1In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways, 2but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe. 3The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven. 4So he became as much superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is superior to theirs.

     5For to which of the angels did God ever say,
       "You are my Son;
          today I have become your Father
    [a]"[b]? Or again,
       "I will be his Father,
          and he will be my Son"
    [c]? 6And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says,
       "Let all God's angels worship him."
    [d] 7In speaking of the angels he says,
       "He makes his angels winds,
          his servants flames of fire."
    [e] 8But about the Son he says,
       "Your throne, O God, will last forever and ever,
          and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.
     
    9You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
          therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions
          by anointing you with the oil of joy."
    [f] 10He also says,
       "In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
          and the heavens are the work of your hands.
     
    11They will perish, but you remain;
          they will all wear out like a garment.
     
    12You will roll them up like a robe;
          like a garment they will be changed.
       But you remain the same,
          and your years will never end."
    [g] 13To which of the angels did God ever say,
          "Sit at my right hand
       until I make your enemies
          a footstool for your feet"
    [h]? 14Are not all angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation?

     

    What can we learn from this book?  In this book we learn the position of the Universe in Christ.  If we believe in the theories of Jesus Christ of the next generations, and entering the opportunities of self-sustaining, and global sustaining, we might recognizing the process of this development of self.  It is not evolving, though I may use evolution to play around with the concepts of development, but I find using these concepts trouble and confuse some evolutionists.  Therefore, we will start with the clarity order of children development to become the concept of global and societal development.  It is a cultural development that we can add into this calculation.  It is within my heart to use this theology to explain our “thinkers” let us begin with the thinker, “Jesus” as a revolutionary man, and man from space. I am playing on terminology of “The Star Trek era” so please humor me.  I thought it would be a nice addition to include in the factors of science fiction with science and religion.

    If you are having difficulties in following the theories, I would recommend catching up on the Star Trek episodes and Star Wars, if you are not into quantum physics.  It is the second understanding in these calculations of metaphysics and global religions.  So, let us begin in today’s chat.  It is I that I have designed these theories to center around Jesus Christ as one of the many thinkers, but the first man from space, what do I mean first man from the Moon and Sun. This is playing on terminologies again with “the man from the universe.”  It is within our understanding that the visitations of “space” have been coded in our history books, and religions to be kept as a hidden “golden nugget” for generations to read between the lines.  It is no wonder that we have the “insane” the troubled chemicals in our day and age.  How are we to make sense of such absurdness, Right?  Of course, and still function as a capitalist right minded liberal, or some may want to laugh and ponder as a republic-democracy of liberty and justice for the few, and all.  It is within the complexities of thought, we suggest in conversation that salvation began in the theories of Jesus Christ, yet in the age of Egyptology of dynasties of Egypt, Africa at her climax, we found in the fairy tales, children playing with legions of salvation and eternal living, or some would call, death no more.

    It is no wonder that the man “Jesus” ran with these tales for the Judaism practiced was a death ritual of sacrifices of blood for a resurrection, or hope after the dead.  But, this Jesus, thought that a system must be for those living “Today” not “Tomorrow”  because it would be redundant to have a system that promised life after death.  He promised life after life, so what does this mean?  It is within our chat, that this theory of man of earth could not make such a claim because how would he move a generation into an Egypt tale of life after life?  It was not enough to give a person tools to believe because reincarnation, resurrection and finally, eternal damnation was already systems given to the oppressed, but for the systems of the wealthy, oppressors, they had the system of life like a god.

    It is not said, that life of a god, like Zeus, and Hercules, the gods and goddesses would be “live long and prosper” it was in their minds, hearts, and life practices not to speak of death.  It was a shock when these men of honor, or authority died, infected with disease, because they were not the same as the oppressed.  They thought of themselves like gods.  But when they died like men, or the oppressed, they started to figure something was wrong in their equation, so they began the “killings” of the oppressed.  They felt it was their “tainted” or unclean nature that was causing them to be broken, or “golden thread” to be damaged.  It was the war against the humans with the “gods” or “authorities of wealthy”  it was not said literally, but implied by the “reading between the lines,” that the unclean was the oppressed, and the gods and goddesses were royalty and the oppressors, or tyrants.  They could not have goodness in them because goodness was considered as weak.  They had to be a strong “rod” to lead nations.

    Of course, tyranny was the way, truth and life for these “gods” that ruled with a heavy hand.  And so, traditions and traditions in our learning continued the legacy of “ruling with a heavy hand.”  Remember “it is my way or no way, or we must work by sweat and blood, and so forth.”  It is no wonder we have given way to these traditions as “good” or “acceptable behavior”  We continue in the exaltation of tyrant men like Columbus, and so forth, because they carry this legacy of the gods, or the terminology play off, the men of wealth.

    So, what in the heck does this have to do with us “Poor man Jesus Christ”  well, the man of the moon, and stars, and sun, was the man that came to prove the difference between the “mythology of gods” and the “true gods” or “God” whatever the case in that children of the God.  These theories were to manifest as they had “performed” as “rituals,” Jesus was to prove that a person of his esteem was the true “identification” of man of earth and man of space.  What does this mean for us, and who cares?  According to the scriptures, it was the explanations to Rome why he was not a “the real thang.”  Jesus was there in his face showing him his own fate, and without the evidence “Rome” would be just actors in a play.  All tyrants would be just that, “actors” in a play that would be a horrible demonstration of the “truth” they wanted so bad to be.

    These complications of “Jesus” confused the heck out of the Judaism Religious Leaders.  They were not men who were students neither of mythology nor of Paganism.  They had no clue what the heck Jesus was chatting about most of the time.   The realism of his speeches for the Jews were basic, are you looking for your messiah, here I am.  Everything else had a “tongue” for the Rome and “Gentile” population.  They could not interpret the scripture until “Paul” the Roman, could explain the “Gentile” section of the “speeches” of why it was necessary for Jesus to come as man of earth and man of space.  It was in mythology that Jesus was explaining the fulfillment of the Pagan faith.  He had fulfilled the faith of Earth, Judaism, who believed in one God, then he fulfilled the faith of the pagans of many gods.  He was explaining lessons of the universe, which we could interpret now the “universe, realms and light years, of knowledge” that only beings of living organisms that organize over billions of years, if not greater could interpret and translate.  It was the stars that shed light of his existence, and the students of the stars, the wise men, was able to read or some would say interpret their language, explaining the Christ, or this man’s biological DNA.  It was complex for the poor Roman king to understand that a Jew would be a god like himself, but it was more than a boy that was a god.  It was the oppressed society raising up a god, as the tyrants would say only was fit for the wealthy.

    It was a slave who would be raised up to be a “god” and that troubled the Roman empire as their understanding as a Pagan god to allow such peasants to master the secrets or “education” of their diplomacy, wealth, and royalty position in the universe.  It was a “Pagan” education system of tyrants that had to be in reform, a social change on the horizon.  It was in the disciples “study” that the “gentles” would be the most effected, and so become the most effective, because it would understand Jesus as the “god” of the earth.  Judaism could not understand “Mythology” because in their study it was abolished as a forbidden practice and forbidden teaching to give to their children, so they did not have knowledge of such systems of “Pagan worship.”

    Where are we going, stay in touch, and we will continue to delve into the ancient knowledge of good and evil, but what we call in our terminologies, the knowledge of principles and theories.