Welcome to the ULC Minister's Network

+Bro Karl Buchanan, OE

The "New" Needs Standard

  •  

    "Maslow's Hierarchy of Human Needs" has served as the standard theory model in both secular and sacred colleges. Even where another theory officially predominates, you will find Maslow and see him more in practice than any other founder of the psychological discipline. While most everybody is familiar with the pyramid of needs, there have been 3 new needs put forth as significant parts of the need the fulfilled and one, the new highest level beyond self actualization called "Transcendence Needs", a major part of which is helping others to reach self actualization, previously the highest level. Below is the modern version of the theory which may help to enhance those already familiar and be of help to those new to fundamental psychological theories. 
    For those who are new, Abraham Maslow is one of the founding minds of psychiatry whose theories differed from Freud's dramatically. The simplest thought on the pyramid of human needs is that the need below a need must be fulfilled in order to reach that need. We must fulfill our pyramid from the bottom up in order to reach it's summit. It is thought generally that "Love and Belonging" is the highest most essential level, and those above it are not a gaurantee.
    Since the image came out so small 1) It's in my photos and 2) here is the list of needs:
    Note: The pyramid is divided into "deficit needs" at the bottom and "being" needs at the top. The original pyramid went, from bottom or most important primary needs to top:
    1) Biological needs (because you can't run from the tiger if you're starving)
    2) Security needs (because you can't eat or think of other things while running from the tiger)
    3) Love and Belonging (what people will do when they aren't hungry or running)
    4) Self Esteem
    5) Self Actualization (Self/Identity fulfillment)
    The new pyramid now inlcudes:
    (called "Deficit" needs)
    1) Biological
    2) Security
    3) Love and Belonging
    4) -------------------- Cognitive needs (Need for knowledge, meaning)
    5) Self Esteem
    6) -------------------- Aesthetic needs (need for beauty, balance, muse)
    7) Self Actualization
    8) -------------------- Transcendence needs (need to help others reach self actualization)
    (called "Being" needs)
    If your lower needs are fulfilled, you can achieve your higher needs and the degree to which your lower needs are not fulfilled will reflect in your ability to achieve your higher ones, uncompensated for.Maslow is a way of catagorizing and getting some understanding - as long as we remember that psychology is theory of what might be; people are real and not real good about fitting molds. Never let even the most benign behavior theory rule over what is right in front of you. Psychology is one of the most slippery slopes in all the disciplines. "Keep the grape and spit the seed" as the Rabbi would say ~

     

    About the (pen-) Ultimate Goal: Self Actualization

    One must satisfy lower level basic needs before progressing on to meet higher level growth needs.  Once these needs have been reasonably satisfied, one may be able to reach the highest level called self-actualization.

    Every person is capable and has the desire to move up the hierarchy toward a level of self-actualization. Unfortunately,progress is often disrupted by failure to meet lower level needs. Life experiences including divorce and loss of job may cause an individual to fluctuate between levels of the hierarchy.

    We must remain vigilant and aware of our own pyramid as a measure of the level of resistance we are affected by.Maslow noted only one in a hundred people become fullyself-actualized, because our society rewards motivation primarily based on esteem, love and other social needs.

    Maslow (1968): Some of the characteristics of self-actualized people, Although we are all, theoretically, capable of self-actualizing, most of us will not do so, or only to a limited degree.  Maslow was particularly interested in the characteristics of people whom he considered to have achieved their potential as persons.  

    By studying people he considered to be self-actualized (including Abraham Lincoln and Albert Einstein) Maslow identified 15 characteristics of a self-actualized person. Characteristics of self-actualizers:

    1. They perceive reality efficiently and can tolerate uncertainty;

    2. Accept themselves and others for what they are;

    3. Spontaneous in thought and action;

    4. Problem-centered (not self-centered);

    5. Unusual sense of humor;

    6. Able to look at life objectively;

    7. Highly creative;

    8. Resistant to enculturation, but not purposely unconventional;

    9. Concerned for the welfare of humanity;

    10. Capable of deep appreciation of basic life-experience;

    11. Establish deep satisfying interpersonal relationships with a few people;

    12. Peak experiences;

    13. Need for privacy;

    14. Democratic attitudes;

    15. Strong moral/ethical standards.


    Behavior leading to self-actualization:

    (a) Experiencing life like a child, with full absorption and concentration;

    (b) Trying new things instead of sticking to safe paths;

    (c) Listening to your own feelings in evaluating experiences instead of the voice of tradition, authority or the majority;

    (d) Avoiding pretense ('game playing') and being honest;

    (e) Being prepared to be unpopular if your views do not coincide with those of the majority;

    (f) Taking responsibility and working hard;

    (g) Trying to identify your defenses and having the courage to give them up.


    The characteristics of self-actualizers and the behaviors leading to self-actualization are shown in the list above.  Although people achieve self-actualization in their own unique way, they tend to share certain characteristics.  However, self-actualization is a matter of degree, 'There are no perfect human beings' (Maslow, 1970, p. 176).

    It is not necessary to display all 15 characteristics to become self-actualized, and not only self-actualized people will display them.  Maslow did not equate self-actualization with perfection. Self-actualization merely involves achieving ones potential.  Thus someone can be silly, wasteful, vain and impolite, and still self-actualize.  Theoretically, less than two percent of the population achieve self-actualization.


    More on Self ActualizationMaslow has used a variety of terms to refer to this level:  He has called it growth motivation (in contrast to deficit motivation), being needs (or B-needs, in contrast to D-needs), and self-actualization.These are needs that do not involve balance or homeostasis.  Once engaged, they continue to be felt.  In fact, they are likely to become stronger as we “feed” them!  They involve the continuous desire to fulfill potentials, to “be all that you can be.”  They are a matter of becoming the most complete, the fullest, “you” -- hence the term, self-actualization.


    Now, in keeping with his theory up to this point, if you want to be truly self-actualizing, you need to have your lower needs taken care of, at least to a considerable extent.  This makes sense:  If you are hungry, you are scrambling to get food;  If you are unsafe, you have to be continuously on guard;  If you are isolated and unloved, you have to satisfy that need;  If you have a low sense of self-esteem, you have to be defensive or compensate.  When lower needs are unmet, you can’t fully devote yourself to fulfilling your potentials.What

     

    Maslow learned about his "Self Actualizers" was that these people were reality-centered, which means they could differentiate what is fake and dishonest from what is real and genuine.  They were problem-centered, meaning they treated life’s difficulties as problems demanding solutions, not as personal troubles to be railed at or surrendered to.  And they had a different perception of means and ends.  They felt that the ends don’t necessarily justify the means, that the means could be ends themselves, and that the means -- the journey -- was often more important than the ends.

     

    The self-actualizers also had a different way of relating to others.  

    First, they enjoyed solitude, and were comfortable being alone. And they enjoyed deeper personal relations with a few close friends and family members, rather than more shallow relationships with many people.

    They enjoyed autonomy, a relative independence from physical and social needs.  And they resisted enculturation, that is, they were not susceptible to social pressure to be "well adjusted" or to "fit in" -- they were, in fact, nonconformists in the best sense.

    They had an unhostile sense of humor -- preferring to joke at their own expense, or at the human condition, and never directing their humor at others.  

    They had a quality he called "acceptance of self and others", by which he meant that these people would be more likely to take you as you are than try to change you into what they thought you should be.

    This same acceptance applied to their attitudes towards themselves:  If some quality of theirs wasn’t harmful, they let it be, even enjoying it as a personal quirk.  On the other hand, they were often strongly motivated to change negative qualities in themselves that could be changed.  Along with this comes spontaneity and simplicity:  They preferred being themselves rather than being pretentious or artificial.  In fact, for all their nonconformity, he found that they tended to be conventional on the surface, just where less self-actualizing nonconformists tend to be the most dramatic.

    Further, they had a sense of humility and respect towards others -- something Maslow also called democratic values -- meaning that they were open to ethnic and individual variety, even treasuring it.

    They had a quality Maslow called human kinship or Gemeinschaftsgefühl -- social interest, compassion, humanity. This was accompanied by a strong ethics, which was spiritual but seldom conventionally religious in nature.

    And these people had a certain freshness of appreciation, an ability to see things, even ordinary things, with wonder.  Along with this comes their ability to be creative, inventive, and original.  Finally, these people tended to have more peak experiences than the average person.  A peak experience is one that takes you out of yourself, that makes you feel very tiny, or very large, to some extent one with life or nature or God.  It gives you a feeling of being a part of the infinite and the eternal.  

    These experiences tend to leave their mark on a person, change them for the better, and many people actively seek them out.  They are also called mystical experiences, and are an important part of many religious and philosophical traditions.


    Maslow doesn’t think that self-actualizers are perfect, of course. There were several flaws or imperfections he discovered along the way as well:  First, they often suffered considerable anxiety and guilt -- but realistic anxiety and guilt, rather than misplaced or neurotic versions.  Some of them were absentminded and overly kind.  And finally, some of them had unexpected moments of ruthlessness, surgical coldness, and loss of humor.

    Two other points he makes about these self-actualizers:  

    Their values were "natural" and seemed to flow effortlessly from their personalities.  And they appeared to transcend many of the dichotomies others accept as being undeniable, such as the differences between the spiritual and the physical, the selfish and the unselfish, and the masculine and the feminine. In short, self actualizers had ascended to a higher expression of life. Their challeneges were commensurate with their thought level and expectations.

    A Self Actualized person successfully negotiating the Trancendence stage is the penultimate status in Order development and the closest human thing to a natural agent of the First Cause.


    Metaneeds and metapathologies 

    Maslow talked about the special, driving needs (B-needs, of course) of the self-actualizers.  They need the following in their lives in order to be happy:

    Truth, rather than dishonesty. 

    Goodness, rather than evil. 

    Beauty, not ugliness or vulgarity. 

    Unity, wholeness, and transcendence of opposites, not arbitrariness or forced choices. 

    Aliveness, not deadness or the mechanization of life. Uniqueness, not bland uniformity. 

    Perfection and necessity, not sloppiness, inconsistency, or accident. 

    Completion, rather than incompleteness. 

    Justice and order, not injustice and lawlessness. 

    Simplicity, not unnecessary complexity. 

    Richness, not environmental impoverishment. 

    Effortlessness, not strain. 

    Playfulness, not grim, humorless, drudgery. 

    Self-sufficiency, not dependency. 

    Meaningfulness, rather than senselessness.


    At first glance, you might think that everyone obviously needs these.  But think:  If you are living through an economic depression or a war, or are living in a ghetto or in rural poverty, do you worry about these issues, or do you worry about getting enough to eat and a roof over your head?  In fact, Maslow believes that much of the what is wrong with the world comes down to the fact that very few people really are interested in these values -- not because they are bad people, but because they haven’t even had their basic needs taken care of.

    Deprivation that we have not trancended is like the darkness. Like a false "spell" that can assault us at various times and many of us do not resist or harmonize the effects succumbing to dulled senses, lack of personal fulfillment and health problems.
    When a self-actualizer doesn’t get these needs fulfilled, they respond with metapathologies -- a list of problems equivalent to the list of metaneeds.  It can be summarized in saying that, when forced to live without these values, the self-actualizer is at high risk to develop depression, despair, disgust, alienation, and a degree of cynicism. The Adept must be prepared against such circumstances so he is fully able for battle and to cause change.

1 comment
  • kiwani  [e.lawson]
    kiwani [e.lawson] Karl, I fully believe Maslow's theory is a great foundation in beginning to understand human behavior - why people do & act in certain ways and their motivations... & where people are at in their stage of life across several areas (safety/security basic n...  more
    May 22, 2013 - 1 likes this